[Harp-L] Re: XB-40
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: XB-40
- From: "jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dmf273@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:08:10 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=IsPIrwdOxFOJq8/rm6IK4qEbFUMJ+L4lHxnTPxAKykjlVSYaBDCK5M4AFDPRB+57WfrwwMe/PoEGIxEkmF6qt6mbQep8w9eF4OuwRyU6FvjH1MUVNaCfR1otlRKNiThKWwwE/OMXzvhcT9AsHbTSf3GU6kGra4hJk7rxnA90PK4= ;
- In-reply-to: <200501072224.j07MLgFF023997@harp-l.org>
- Reply-to: jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Richard's review of his new XB-40 says "Overblowing doesn't work at all".
That's certainly true for an out-of-the-box XB-40. But Rick Epping says that if you retune the
beast appropriately, overblows are actually easier and more stable on an XB-40 than on a regular
diatonic.
I don't know if anyone else has verified this. Maybe Pat Missin?
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.